– Have a book review! I agree that the book is too short and the craft is lacking. The reason I think it is important and enduring is because, look at how few white people appear on the page in this book, and look what they do to this entire culture. That is what makes it art for me.
I’ve struggled with this review. I’m torn. There’s the academic side of my brain saying ‘you know why this book is important’ and the fluffy part of my brain saying ‘yeah but the story wasn’t good enough.’
This book is on my reading list for the ‘Post Colonial Literatures’ module which starts next week, so it was a case of ‘read this or look like an idiot in class’.
What did I like?
Okwonko’s daughter – She could have held the story on her own. I was far more interested in her character than any other. The potential for a kick ass chick right there.
Setting – There’s no getting away from the environment. Achebe puts you right into the thick of it, unapologetic about using local terms and language, and at times it was alienating. But it worked to great effect.
– I am not a symbol-hunter myself, and I think talking about intentional symbolism, unless you are dealing with an allegory, is a waste of time. But I do agree with Asimov that’s its impossible to avoid unconscious symbolism, and I like what Ellison says about readers finding symbols being an indication that their mind is collaborating with the author’s work. I’ve said this before – there is a social element to writing that we do not talk about enough. “Composition” is a solitary activity, but it is only one component of what I think of as “writing.” Writing begins when you have an idea and doesn’t end until you have someone reading the finished piece. That is what I think.
You always wondered if your college lit professor was just making crap up.
Turns out, maybe they were.
This article from The Paris Review offers a revealing take by many famous authors on how much symbolism played a part in their work.
Their comments were prompted by a letter from a 16-year-old Bruce McCallister in 1963. He was tired of the constant find-the-symbolism game in English class, so he took it upon himself to ask them what the big deal was with symbolism.
He mailed a simple four-question survey to more than 150 novelists. About half of them responded. The responses were varied, but most of the authors seemed to think symbolism is overanalyzed. Their comments were awesome:
– I’ve decided to give this a go with The Writing Catalog. I’ll register in the next day or two as a Writing blog. The rules are already laid out, and they suggest short posts. I will use it to build something nice for the resources page I am planning. I’ll follow up soon with more info.
I’m deep inside the World of Editing. I’m reading, re-reading and hacking away at Amy’s Courage. It’s not easy. Like most writers, I hate editing. But it’s a necessity. It must be done.
What helps me is to break it down in to little pieces that are manageable and to believe I can do it. I’ve done it before. I can do it again. I don’t have to get it perfect right now, I just want progress.
It also helps if I have resources. And one of the best I’ve seen is Nathan Bransford. The guy is genius. He’s actually written a book on how to write a novel.
Here are some examples of Nathan’s amazing resources for editing:
I am a pluralist when it comes to writing. I regard all genres as equal, whether they are to my taste or not.
I truly believe that almost anyone can become a competent writer. What I mean by “competent” is that you can learn to communicate in text in such a way that you say what you mean and you will not be socially disadvantaged by the way you use the language.
All you have to to do is practice (a lot), and read good examples of what you want to write, and convince other people to teach you their tricks. I can’t help you write The Grapes of Wrath, or guarantee you a good grade, but I can promise you that if you talk with me about writing I will be sensitive and make an honest effort to help you.
I don’t care whether your goal is to produce a piece of serviceable genre fiction, or to get published in Nature, or to write more effective memos. If you ask me a question I will do my best to answer it. If it’s beyond me, I will tell you I don’t know and try to help you find someone who can answer it.
I am not a great writer, but I am a great editor, and I know what good writing looks like. I know how to go though a manuscript and eliminate all the unnecessary words while leaving the author’s voice intact. I am also a pretty good tutor (though real teaching is beyond me).
I am here for other writers. If you drop a comment on one of my threads, I will answer it.
Marianne Dashwood, the epitome of sensibility, is the heroine Jane Austen most disapproves of…
The six complete Jane Austen novels divide into three interesting pairs. There are the “place” titles – Northanger Abbeyand Mansfield Park – both of which critique the heroine’s naivete. Emma and Persuasion – the “one word” titles – focus on, in the former case, the consequences of a young woman with too much self-confidence and, in the latter case, the consequences of an older woman’s youthful lack of self-confidence. Finally, there are the “characteristics” titles – Sense and Sensibility and Pride and Prejudice – that, via characters in each novel who exhibit behaviors related to the titular characteristics, allow the author to show, in the latter work, how the character weaknesses of the novels’ most important couple, once overcome, lead to marital bliss – and, in the former work, contrast sisters who represent both sense…
Thanks to Sonya at Capture You photography for nominating this blog for the Sunshine Award. I discovered her blog during the first week of the Zero to Hero challenge, and her exquisite images made me an instant follower. It may be a week before I can do a nomination post of my own, and I wanted to be sure and thank her. This is the Writing Catalog’s first nomination from a blogger outside the Part Time Monster family.
I have one more round of development to do with Sourcerer, and then I will be ready to begin improving the design and pages of this site. I’m listing my blogs on several directories this weekend and setting up a Pinterest account that I’ll use to build boards related to all our blogs. Once I am done with that, I will give The Writing Catalog an overhaul.
I’m planning to re-write the About page and expand the scope of my content here a little. It will still be writing-centric, and the links will still feature mostly writing-related content. In addition, though, I am going to use this blog as an online portfolio for myself and an archive of the best work we’ve done on other blogs.
Eventually I will have an index page of every blog series that I and the other contributors to our blogs have written. I’ll also add a few resource pages – one for writing, another for the writing aspects of blogging, another for non-blog websites that I find helpful for various forms of writing. I also plan to include some humanities education-related content and some of my own creative work.
Thanks to everyone who reads this blog; I hope will continue to provide a medium to help me connect with others bloggers who enjoy talking about writing.